Skip to content

Water wells in the Southeast Texas Groundwater Conservation District

Home water wells inside the Southeast Texas Groundwater Conservation District (Jasper, Newton, Tyler and Hardin counties, Texas) are typically 130 to 255 feet deep (median 190 ft, 2,566 wells drilled in the last 10 years). Most draw from the Chicot Aquifer (62%), and 23% draw from the Jasper and Catahoula aquifers, with the Burkeville, according to the state's northern Gulf Coast Aquifer model (TWDB). The split between the Chicot and the Evangeline is approximate. Over the last three full years drillers reported about 246 new home wells a year; the peak was 331 in 2011. Estimated cost of a complete well at the median depth: $7,500 to $18,000.

Updated every day from Texas Water Development Board driller reports. Last update: November 11, 2026, using the state file of November 10, 2026.

Map of the Southeast Texas Groundwater Conservation DistrictDistrict boundary (Jasper, Newton, Tyler and Hardin counties) with the places that have the most home wells.Lumberton: 380 ftLumbertonPinewood Estates: 194 ftPinewood EstatesBuna: 210 ftBunaSam Rayburn: 120 ftSam RayburnSour Lake: 220 ftKountze: 410 ftKountzeIvanhoe: 120 ftIvanhoeEvadale: 397 ftEvadale25 miles

Under the center of the Southeast Texas GCD

District boundary from TWDB's file current as of November 2019. Later changes are not shown.

Home wells in and around the Southeast Texas GCD

Each dot is a home well from a state driller report, colored by depth. Tap one for its details and official report. Tap an empty spot to see what is under that point.

See underground

Well depth (ft)

  • <100
  • 100
  • 200
  • 300
  • 400
  • 600
  • 800+

Dark line: the district boundary (TWDB, 2019)

Key figures

Typical depth (middle half)
130 to 255 feet
Median depth
190 feet
Deepest 10% are past
382 feet
Water level (median)
35 feet
2,484 wells
Yield (median)
20 gpm
1,847 wells, gallons per minute
Wells used
2,566
In the last 10 years
Counties
4
All years on file
5,898
median 190 ft, since 2001
Confidence
Standard (30 or more wells)

When the wells were finished, the water stood a median 35 feet below the surface (2,484 wells), well above the bottom: the typical well holds about 155 feet of water.

Map of the Southeast Texas Groundwater Conservation DistrictDistrict boundary (Jasper, Newton, Tyler and Hardin counties) with the places that have the most home wells.Lumberton: 380 ftLumbertonPinewood Estates: 194 ftPinewood EstatesBuna: 210 ftBunaSam Rayburn: 120 ftSam RayburnSour Lake: 220 ftKountze: 410 ftKountzeIvanhoe: 120 ftIvanhoeEvadale: 397 ftEvadale25 miles
District boundary from TWDB's file current as of November 2019. Later changes are not shown.

New home wells per year

Over the last three full years drillers reported about 246 new home wells a year; the peak was 331 in 2011.

Home wells reported per year in the Southeast Texas GCDFrom 2002 to 2026. The table below has every year.01002003004002002: 22003: 1632004: 17320042005: 2252006: 2842007: 2402008: 19820082009: 2582010: 2762011: 3312012: 24420122013: 2352014: 2322015: 2652016: 23320162017: 2562018: 2602019: 2392020: 28520202021: 3002022: 3032023: 2602024: 25120242025: 2262026: 158
Domestic wells with a depth, by the year they were finished. 2026 is still in progress.
Show the data table
YearWells
20022
2003163
2004173
2005225
2006284
2007240
2008198
2009258
2010276
2011331
2012244
2013235
2014232
2015265
2016233
2017256
2018260
2019239
2020285
2021300
2022303
2023260
2024251
2025226
2026158

Which formation the wells draw from

Most draw from the Chicot Aquifer (62%), and 23% draw from the Jasper and Catahoula aquifers, with the Burkeville, according to the state's northern Gulf Coast Aquifer model (TWDB). The line between the Chicot and the Evangeline is drawn differently by different studies, so read that split as approximate: of the wells the state records in the Evangeline, our method finds the Evangeline for only about 51% and the Chicot for most of the rest.

Layer (state's model)ShareWellsTypical depth (ft)
Chicot62%1,577155–300
Jasper, Catahoula and Burkeville23%591110–206
Evangeline15%376120–210
Near or below the base of the Gulf Coast Aquifer<1%4—

For 76% of these wells the report says where the water enters and we use the middle of that interval; for the rest we use the bottom of the hole, which tends to read one layer too deep.

Places with the most wells in the district

PlaceMedian depth (ft)Middle half (ft)WellsMain layer
Lumberton380200–445142Chicot Aquifer
Pinewood Estates194161–240130Chicot Aquifer
Buna210182–22895Chicot Aquifer
Sam Rayburn120100–16081Jasper and Catahoula, with the Burkeville
Sour Lake220130–23071Chicot Aquifer
Kountze410220–43667Chicot Aquifer
Ivanhoe120100–20564Evangeline Aquifer
Evadale397260–44061Chicot Aquifer
Warren205155–22259Evangeline Aquifer
Wildwood220187–33654Chicot Aquifer
Beaumont210155–40053Chicot Aquifer
Colmesneil11580–14553Jasper and Catahoula, with the Burkeville

Counties

Depth over time

Home well depth in the district has not changed meaningfully in 20 years: the median was 188 feet in 2003 to 2007 and 195 feet in 2021 to 2025 (a difference under 10% or within the margin of error).

PeriodMedian depth (ft)Wells
2001–2005190564
2006–20101851,256
2011–20151901,307
2016–20201801,273
2021–20251951,340
2026200158

Embed this on your site

Districts, counties, reporters and agents can embed this summary, which updates itself every day. Copy and paste this code:

<iframe src="https://terrafunded.com/embed/wells/district/southeast-texas-groundwater-conservation-district" title="Water wells: Southeast Texas Groundwater Conservation District" loading="lazy" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;height:430px;border:0"></iframe>

Or this one line, which keeps the height right by itself:

<script async src="https://terrafunded.com/vendor/subsurface-embed-v1.js" data-district="southeast-texas-groundwater-conservation-district"></script>

Free, under CC BY 4.0. We only ask that you keep the source link. Preview the widget

Common questions

How deep are wells in the Southeast Texas GCD?

Home water wells inside the Southeast Texas Groundwater Conservation District (Jasper, Newton, Tyler and Hardin counties, Texas) are typically 130 to 255 feet deep (median 190 ft, 2,566 wells drilled in the last 10 years).

Which formation do wells in the district draw from?

Most draw from the Chicot Aquifer (62%), and 23% draw from the Jasper and Catahoula aquifers, with the Burkeville, according to the state's northern Gulf Coast Aquifer model (TWDB). The line between the Chicot and the Evangeline is drawn differently by different studies, so read that split as approximate: of the wells the state records in the Evangeline, our method finds the Evangeline for only about 51% and the Chicot for most of the rest.

What does a groundwater conservation district do?

In Texas, districts are the local authority over groundwater: they can require registration or permits for new wells, set spacing from other wells and property lines, and limit pumping. Each district writes its own rules, so ask the Southeast Texas Groundwater Conservation District before drilling inside it.

What a well costs here

At the median depth for the district (190 feet), a complete home well would cost roughly $7,500 to $18,000: $25 to $60 per foot for drilling, casing and seal, plus $2,500 to $6,500 for the pump, pressure tank, controls and hookup at the well. Across the whole middle half of depths (130 to 255 feet) the range runs from $6,000 to $22,000. This is TerraFunded's estimate from published Texas prices, not a quote, and it leaves out trenching and the line to the house. Get prices from at least two licensed drillers.

How these numbers are made

We count new and replacement domestic (home) wells whose coordinates fall inside the district boundary. We use the last 10 years when there are at least 30 wells; otherwise all since 2001. The median is the middle well and the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile.

To tell which layer a well draws from, we take the ground elevation at its location, subtract the depth of the interval where water enters (or the bottom of the hole when the report does not give one) and see which layer of the state's model that point falls in.

For 76% of these wells the report says where the water enters and we use the middle of that interval; for the rest we use the bottom of the hole, which tends to read one layer too deep.

How well it works: In 14,333 wells in the area of the state's northern Gulf Coast Aquifer model (Houston and Southeast Texas) where the State of Texas recorded the aquifer, the formation our method says the well draws from (as grouped on these pages) is the one the state recorded in about 83% of them, and that formation or the one next to it in at least 99%; of the 3,578 of those wells that the state records in the Evangeline, it names the Evangeline for about 51% and the Chicot for most of the rest.

  • The layers come from the Texas Water Development Board's northern Gulf Coast Aquifer model, with cells of about 0.62 mile (1 km). It is a regional model, not a survey of any lot.
  • The state's model has cells of about 3,277 ft (1 km, 0.62 mile); we read it on a grid of about 0.6 by 0.7 miles. It is not a survey of any lot, so we give ranges.
  • Figures go by three groups: Chicot, Evangeline, and Jasper and Catahoula with the Burkeville. The state's records cannot tell the Burkeville, the Jasper and the Catahoula apart at a well (alone, the Burkeville matched 33% and the Catahoula 50%), so they are never named one by one as the formation of a well or a place.
  • The line between the Chicot and the Evangeline is drawn differently by different studies. The state's records put about half of their Evangeline wells in what the model draws as the Chicot, mostly deeper wells in Harris, Montgomery, Waller, Liberty and Austin counties. Where both appear, the split is approximate.
  • "Near or below the base" means the well ends near or below the base of the Gulf Coast Aquifer (under the Catahoula: Jackson Group, Yegua and older). It is 1.3% of home wells; half of them end within about 85 ft of the base. That is not an error: the model simply ends there.
  • The model's top layer is a uniform 49 ft slab for the water table zone, not a rock unit; we merge it into the unit beneath. The model also covers Colorado, Lavaca, Fayette, Wharton and Matagorda counties (outside Groundwater Management Area 14), with the same framework. Texas part only.
  • We never use the model's water levels. The water level on this page is the one each driller measured when the well was finished.

These are depths of real wells drilled nearby, not a promise about any property. Groundwater can change over short distances and with drought. A licensed water well driller can tell you what to expect on a specific tract.

Read the full methodology · Download the data (CSV, CC BY 4.0)

How to cite

TerraFunded (2026). Texas Well Atlas: Underground. From Texas Water Development Board driller reports and groundwater availability models (data as of November 10, 2026). https://terrafunded.com/wells/districts/southeast-texas-groundwater-conservation-district. License CC BY 4.0. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24126380.

Sources