Water wells in the North Plains Groundwater Conservation District
Home water wells inside the North Plains Groundwater Conservation District (Dallam, Hartley, Lipscomb, Sherman and 4 more counties, Texas) are typically 420 to 545 feet deep (median 500 ft, 529 wells drilled in the last 10 years). Most draw from the Ogallala Aquifer (68%), and 24% end at or just below the base of the Ogallala, in the top of the Dockum, according to the state's High Plains Aquifer System model (TWDB). Over the last three full years drillers reported about 57 new home wells a year; the peak was 78 in 2021. Estimated cost of a complete well at the median depth: $15,000 to $36,500.
Updated every day from Texas Water Development Board driller reports. Last update: November 11, 2026, using the state file of November 10, 2026.
Under the center of the North Plains GCD
District boundary from TWDB's file current as of November 2019. Later changes are not shown.
Digging in…
Home wells in and around the North Plains GCD
Each dot is a home well from a state driller report, colored by depth. Tap one for its details and official report. Tap an empty spot to see what is under that point.
Well depth (ft)
- <100
- 100
- 200
- 300
- 400
- 600
- 800+
Dark line: the district boundary (TWDB, 2019)
Green: aquifer mapped by the state
Key figures
- Typical depth (middle half)
- 420 to 545 feet
- Median depth
- 500 feet
- Deepest 10% are past
- 600 feet
- Water level (median)
- 350 feet
- 405 wells
- Yield (median)
- 20 gpm
- 223 wells, gallons per minute
- Wells used
- 529
- In the last 10 years
- Counties
- 8
- All years on file
- 1,277
- median 470 ft, since 1971
- Confidence
- Standard (30 or more wells)
When the wells were finished, the water stood a median 350 feet below the surface (405 wells).
New home wells per year
Over the last three full years drillers reported about 57 new home wells a year; the peak was 78 in 2021.
Show the data table
| Year | Wells |
|---|---|
| 2002 | 4 |
| 2003 | 33 |
| 2004 | 49 |
| 2005 | 41 |
| 2006 | 77 |
| 2007 | 76 |
| 2008 | 63 |
| 2009 | 41 |
| 2010 | 43 |
| 2011 | 36 |
| 2012 | 51 |
| 2013 | 61 |
| 2014 | 58 |
| 2015 | 77 |
| 2016 | 39 |
| 2017 | 38 |
| 2018 | 40 |
| 2019 | 44 |
| 2020 | 46 |
| 2021 | 78 |
| 2022 | 53 |
| 2023 | 65 |
| 2024 | 57 |
| 2025 | 48 |
| 2026 | 58 |
Which formation the wells draw from
Most draw from the Ogallala Aquifer (68%), and 24% end at or just below the base of the Ogallala, in the top of the Dockum, according to the state's High Plains Aquifer System model (TWDB). Read that as the base of the Ogallala or the top of the Dockum, not a certainty: where our method names the Dockum, the state's own record agrees only about 33% of the time (61% for wells with a screened interval), and most of the others are recorded as Ogallala wells.
| Layer (state's model) | Share | Wells | Typical depth (ft) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ogallala | 68% | 359 | 400–520 |
| Dockumat or just below the base of the Ogallala | 24% | 128 | 520–600 |
| Near or below the base of the Dockumor of the Ogallala | 7% | 35 | 458–580 |
| Edwards-TrinityCretaceous rock under the Ogallala | 1% | 7 | 427–510 |
For 94% of these wells the report says where the water enters (the screen or the open hole), and we use the middle of that interval.
Places with the most wells in the district
| Place | Median depth (ft) | Middle half (ft) | Wells | Main layer |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perryton | 400 | 365–420 | 71 | Ogallala Aquifer |
| Dumas | 512 | 500–534 | 50 | Ogallala Aquifer |
| Dalhart | 550 | 535–574 | 33 | Ogallala Aquifer |
| Hartley | 592 | 560–603 | 22 | Dockum Group (at or just below the base of the Ogallala) |
| Gruver | 480 | 462–540 | 16 | Ogallala Aquifer |
| Lipscomb | 100 | 64–169 | 16 | Ogallala Aquifer |
Counties
Depth over time
New home wells in the district are deeper than 20 years ago: the median went from 437 feet (2003 to 2007) to 493 feet (2021 to 2025), 13% more. Deeper wells do not always mean the water dropped: a driller may be going for another layer, better water or more reserve.
| Period | Median depth (ft) | Wells |
|---|---|---|
| 2001–2005 | 430 | 127 |
| 2006–2010 | 440 | 300 |
| 2011–2015 | 458 | 283 |
| 2016–2020 | 510 | 207 |
| 2021–2025 | 493 | 301 |
| 2026 | 488 | 58 |
Embed this on your site
Districts, counties, reporters and agents can embed this summary, which updates itself every day. Copy and paste this code:
<iframe src="https://terrafunded.com/embed/wells/district/north-plains-groundwater-conservation-district" title="Water wells: North Plains Groundwater Conservation District" loading="lazy" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;height:430px;border:0"></iframe>Or this one line, which keeps the height right by itself:
<script async src="https://terrafunded.com/vendor/subsurface-embed-v1.js" data-district="north-plains-groundwater-conservation-district"></script>Free, under CC BY 4.0. We only ask that you keep the source link. Preview the widget
Common questions
How deep are wells in the North Plains GCD?
Home water wells inside the North Plains Groundwater Conservation District (Dallam, Hartley, Lipscomb, Sherman and 4 more counties, Texas) are typically 420 to 545 feet deep (median 500 ft, 529 wells drilled in the last 10 years).
Which formation do wells in the district draw from?
Most draw from the Ogallala Aquifer (68%), and 24% end at or just below the base of the Ogallala, in the top of the Dockum, according to the state's High Plains Aquifer System model (TWDB). Read that as the base of the Ogallala or the top of the Dockum, not a certainty: where our method names the Dockum, the state's own record agrees only about 33% of the time (61% for wells with a screened interval), and most of the others are recorded as Ogallala wells.
What does a groundwater conservation district do?
In Texas, districts are the local authority over groundwater: they can require registration or permits for new wells, set spacing from other wells and property lines, and limit pumping. Each district writes its own rules, so ask the North Plains Groundwater Conservation District before drilling inside it.
What a well costs here
At the median depth for the district (500 feet), a complete home well would cost roughly $15,000 to $36,500: $25 to $60 per foot for drilling, casing and seal, plus $2,500 to $6,500 for the pump, pressure tank, controls and hookup at the well. Across the whole middle half of depths (420 to 545 feet) the range runs from $13,000 to $39,000. This is TerraFunded's estimate from published Texas prices, not a quote, and it leaves out trenching and the line to the house. Get prices from at least two licensed drillers.
How these numbers are made
We count new and replacement domestic (home) wells whose coordinates fall inside the district boundary. We use the last 10 years when there are at least 30 wells; otherwise all since 2001. The median is the middle well and the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile.
To tell which layer a well draws from, we take the ground elevation at its location, subtract the depth of the interval where water enters (or the bottom of the hole when the report does not give one) and see which layer of the state's model that point falls in.
For 94% of these wells the report says where the water enters (the screen or the open hole), and we use the middle of that interval.
How well it works: In 22,814 wells in the Texas part of the state's High Plains Aquifer System model (the Panhandle, the South Plains and the Permian Basin) where the State of Texas recorded the aquifer, the formation our method says the well draws from (as grouped on these pages) is the one the state recorded in about 75% of them; when it names the Dockum (4,542 wells), the state's record agrees only about 33% of the time, and most of the others are recorded as Ogallala wells.
- The layers come from the Texas Water Development Board's High Plains Aquifer System model, with half mile cells, read here on a grid of about 1.2 by 1.4 miles. It is a regional model, not a survey of any lot.
- The state's model has half mile cells; we read it on a grid of about 1.2 by 1.4 miles, Texas part only. Layers from version 1.01 (2015); the 2025 extension (1.02) did not change them. It is not a survey of any lot, so we give ranges.
- Figures go by four groups: Ogallala; Pecos Valley; Edwards-Trinity and Rita Blanca (Cretaceous rock under the Ogallala; the Rita Blanca alone matched the state 19%); Dockum (upper and lower together: the state's codes almost never say which). The Edwards-Trinity group joins three aquifers in different places (High Plains around Lubbock, Plateau around Midland and Odessa, Rita Blanca in Dallam and Hartley): county and place pages name the local one where they can.
- Dockum: when our method names the Dockum, the state's record agrees only 33% of the time over all years (61% for wells with a screened interval, which is 93% of home wells of the last 10 years); most of the rest are recorded as Ogallala wells. The median well we put in the Dockum ends about 18 ft under the base of the Ogallala as the model draws it. So these pages say "at or just below the base of the Ogallala, in the top of the Dockum", never a certain formation. The state's own 2025 report on this model says depth alone overstates the upper Dockum.
- "Near or below the base" means the well ends near or below the base of the Dockum, or of the Ogallala where there is no Dockum (Permian red beds; Gray, Carson, Donley, Moore and north Potter counties). Half of these wells end within about 51 ft of the base, and the state usually records them as Ogallala or Dockum wells. That is not an error: the model simply ends there.
- For old wells without a screened interval (bottom of the hole) the method is only a little better than always saying Ogallala (65% against 58%); with an interval it is 89% against 80%. Figures over all years carry that weakness; last 10 years figures rest almost entirely on intervals.
- We never use the model's water levels. The water level on this page is the one each driller measured when the well was finished.
These are depths of real wells drilled nearby, not a promise about any property. Groundwater can change over short distances and with drought. A licensed water well driller can tell you what to expect on a specific tract.
Read the full methodology · Download the data (CSV, CC BY 4.0)
How to cite
TerraFunded (2026). Texas Well Atlas: Underground. From Texas Water Development Board driller reports and groundwater availability models (data as of November 10, 2026). https://terrafunded.com/wells/districts/north-plains-groundwater-conservation-district. License CC BY 4.0. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24126380.
Sources
- Submitted Driller's Reports database, Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) (file of November 10, 2026)
- Numerical Model Report for the High Plains Aquifer System Groundwater Availability Model. Deeds, N.E., and Jigmond, M. (INTERA Incorporated), for the Texas Water Development Board; extension through 2020 by Cawthon, T., and Wade, S. (TWDB, 2025), 2015, GAM v1.01 (layers unchanged in the 2025 extension, version 1.02). TWDB groundwater availability model.
- Groundwater conservation district boundaries, TWDB (current as of November 2019)
- Ground elevation: Terrain Tiles (Mapzen), Registry of Open Data on AWS
- TWDB well report viewer (each well's official report)
