Skip to content

Water wells in the Middle Pecos Groundwater Conservation District

Home water wells inside the Middle Pecos Groundwater Conservation District (Pecos County, Texas) are typically 188 to 341 feet deep (median 261 ft, 92 wells drilled in the last 10 years). The state's model covers only 14% of these wells (13); among those, 39% draw from the Edwards-Trinity (Plateau) Aquifer, and 31% draw from the Pecos Valley Aquifer, according to the state's High Plains Aquifer System model (TWDB). Drillers reported 3 new home wells in 2025, less than half the peak of 15 in 2020. Estimated cost of a complete well at the median depth: $9,000 to $22,000.

Updated every day from Texas Water Development Board driller reports. Last update: November 11, 2026, using the state file of November 10, 2026.

Map of the Middle Pecos Groundwater Conservation DistrictDistrict boundary (Pecos County) with the places that have the most home wells.Fort Stockton: 235 ftFort Stockton25 miles

Under the center of the Middle Pecos GCD

District boundary from TWDB's file current as of November 2019. Later changes are not shown.

Home wells in and around the Middle Pecos GCD

Each dot is a home well from a state driller report, colored by depth. Tap one for its details and official report. Tap an empty spot to see what is under that point.

See underground

Well depth (ft)

  • <100
  • 100
  • 200
  • 300
  • 400
  • 600
  • 800+

Dark line: the district boundary (TWDB, 2019)

Key figures

Typical depth (middle half)
188 to 341 feet
Median depth
261 feet
Deepest 10% are past
559 feet
Water level (median)
78 feet
68 wells
Yield (median)
50 gpm
40 wells, gallons per minute
Wells used
92
In the last 10 years
Counties
1
All years on file
144
median 256 ft, since 2003
Confidence
Standard (30 or more wells)

When the wells were finished, the water stood a median 78 feet below the surface (68 wells), well above the bottom: the typical well holds about 183 feet of water.

Map of the Middle Pecos Groundwater Conservation DistrictDistrict boundary (Pecos County) with the places that have the most home wells.Fort Stockton: 235 ftFort Stockton25 miles
District boundary from TWDB's file current as of November 2019. Later changes are not shown.

New home wells per year

Drillers reported 3 new home wells in 2025, less than half the peak of 15 in 2020.

Home wells reported per year in the Middle Pecos GCDFrom 2003 to 2026. The table below has every year.0510152003: 42004: 320042005: 42007: 62008: 720082010: 12011: 22012: 120122013: 72014: 52015: 52016: 720162017: 132018: 92019: 132020: 1520202021: 72022: 92023: 102024: 1020242025: 32026: 3
Domestic wells with a depth, by the year they were finished. 2026 is still in progress.
Show the data table
YearWells
20034
20043
20054
20076
20087
20101
20112
20121
20137
20145
20155
20167
201713
20189
201913
202015
20217
20229
202310
202410
20253
20263

Which formation the wells draw from

The state's model covers only 14% of these wells (13); among those, 39% draw from the Edwards-Trinity (Plateau) Aquifer, and 31% draw from the Pecos Valley Aquifer, according to the state's High Plains Aquifer System model (TWDB).

Layer (state's model)ShareWellsTypical depth (ft)
Edwards-Trinity (Plateau)39%5358–490
Pecos Valley31%4—
Dockumat or just below the base of the Ogallala31%4—

For 92% of these wells the report says where the water enters (the screen or the open hole), and we use the middle of that interval.

Places with the most wells in the district

PlaceMedian depth (ft)Middle half (ft)WellsMain layer
Fort Stockton235193–28037—

Counties

Depth over time

There are not enough wells in both 2003 to 2007 and 2021 to 2025 (at least 30 in each) to say with confidence whether wells in the district are getting deeper. For reference, the median was 230 feet in 2001 to 2005 (11 wells) and 278 feet in 2021 to 2025 (39 wells).

PeriodMedian depth (ft)Wells
2001–200523011
2006–201025814
2011–201525820
2016–202025757
2021–202527839
2026under 10 wells3

Embed this on your site

Districts, counties, reporters and agents can embed this summary, which updates itself every day. Copy and paste this code:

<iframe src="https://terrafunded.com/embed/wells/district/middle-pecos-groundwater-conservation-district" title="Water wells: Middle Pecos Groundwater Conservation District" loading="lazy" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;height:430px;border:0"></iframe>

Or this one line, which keeps the height right by itself:

<script async src="https://terrafunded.com/vendor/subsurface-embed-v1.js" data-district="middle-pecos-groundwater-conservation-district"></script>

Free, under CC BY 4.0. We only ask that you keep the source link. Preview the widget

Common questions

How deep are wells in the Middle Pecos GCD?

Home water wells inside the Middle Pecos Groundwater Conservation District (Pecos County, Texas) are typically 188 to 341 feet deep (median 261 ft, 92 wells drilled in the last 10 years).

Which formation do wells in the district draw from?

The state's model covers only 14% of these wells (13); among those, 39% draw from the Edwards-Trinity (Plateau) Aquifer, and 31% draw from the Pecos Valley Aquifer, according to the state's High Plains Aquifer System model (TWDB).

What does a groundwater conservation district do?

In Texas, districts are the local authority over groundwater: they can require registration or permits for new wells, set spacing from other wells and property lines, and limit pumping. Each district writes its own rules, so ask the Middle Pecos Groundwater Conservation District before drilling inside it.

What a well costs here

At the median depth for the district (261 feet), a complete home well would cost roughly $9,000 to $22,000: $25 to $60 per foot for drilling, casing and seal, plus $2,500 to $6,500 for the pump, pressure tank, controls and hookup at the well. Across the whole middle half of depths (188 to 341 feet) the range runs from $7,000 to $27,000. This is TerraFunded's estimate from published Texas prices, not a quote, and it leaves out trenching and the line to the house. Get prices from at least two licensed drillers.

How these numbers are made

We count new and replacement domestic (home) wells whose coordinates fall inside the district boundary. We use the last 10 years when there are at least 30 wells; otherwise all since 2001. The median is the middle well and the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile.

To tell which layer a well draws from, we take the ground elevation at its location, subtract the depth of the interval where water enters (or the bottom of the hole when the report does not give one) and see which layer of the state's model that point falls in.

For 92% of these wells the report says where the water enters (the screen or the open hole), and we use the middle of that interval.

How well it works: In 22,814 wells in the Texas part of the state's High Plains Aquifer System model (the Panhandle, the South Plains and the Permian Basin) where the State of Texas recorded the aquifer, the formation our method says the well draws from (as grouped on these pages) is the one the state recorded in about 75% of them; when it names the Dockum (4,542 wells), the state's record agrees only about 33% of the time, and most of the others are recorded as Ogallala wells.

  • The layers come from the Texas Water Development Board's High Plains Aquifer System model, with half mile cells, read here on a grid of about 1.2 by 1.4 miles. It is a regional model, not a survey of any lot.
  • The state's model has half mile cells; we read it on a grid of about 1.2 by 1.4 miles, Texas part only. Layers from version 1.01 (2015); the 2025 extension (1.02) did not change them. It is not a survey of any lot, so we give ranges.
  • Figures go by four groups: Ogallala; Pecos Valley; Edwards-Trinity and Rita Blanca (Cretaceous rock under the Ogallala; the Rita Blanca alone matched the state 19%); Dockum (upper and lower together: the state's codes almost never say which). The Edwards-Trinity group joins three aquifers in different places (High Plains around Lubbock, Plateau around Midland and Odessa, Rita Blanca in Dallam and Hartley): county and place pages name the local one where they can.
  • Dockum: when our method names the Dockum, the state's record agrees only 33% of the time over all years (61% for wells with a screened interval, which is 93% of home wells of the last 10 years); most of the rest are recorded as Ogallala wells. The median well we put in the Dockum ends about 18 ft under the base of the Ogallala as the model draws it. So these pages say "at or just below the base of the Ogallala, in the top of the Dockum", never a certain formation. The state's own 2025 report on this model says depth alone overstates the upper Dockum.
  • "Near or below the base" means the well ends near or below the base of the Dockum, or of the Ogallala where there is no Dockum (Permian red beds; Gray, Carson, Donley, Moore and north Potter counties). Half of these wells end within about 51 ft of the base, and the state usually records them as Ogallala or Dockum wells. That is not an error: the model simply ends there.
  • For old wells without a screened interval (bottom of the hole) the method is only a little better than always saying Ogallala (65% against 58%); with an interval it is 89% against 80%. Figures over all years carry that weakness; last 10 years figures rest almost entirely on intervals.
  • We never use the model's water levels. The water level on this page is the one each driller measured when the well was finished.

These are depths of real wells drilled nearby, not a promise about any property. Groundwater can change over short distances and with drought. A licensed water well driller can tell you what to expect on a specific tract.

Read the full methodology · Download the data (CSV, CC BY 4.0)

How to cite

TerraFunded (2026). Texas Well Atlas: Underground. From Texas Water Development Board driller reports and groundwater availability models (data as of November 10, 2026). https://terrafunded.com/wells/districts/middle-pecos-groundwater-conservation-district. License CC BY 4.0. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24126380.

Sources