Skip to content

Water wells in the Mesa Underground Water Conservation District

Home water wells inside the Mesa Underground Water Conservation District (Dawson County, Texas) are typically 135 to 190 feet deep (median 168 ft, 140 wells drilled in the last 10 years). Most draw from the Ogallala Aquifer (77%), according to the state's High Plains Aquifer System model (TWDB). Over the last three full years drillers reported about 14 new home wells a year; the peak was 21 in 2020. Estimated cost of a complete well at the median depth: $6,500 to $16,500.

Updated every day from Texas Water Development Board driller reports. Last update: November 11, 2026, using the state file of November 10, 2026.

Map of the Mesa Underground Water Conservation DistrictDistrict boundary (Dawson County) with the places that have the most home wells.Lamesa: 173 ftLamesaLos Ybanez: 175 ftWelch: 118 ftWelchAckerly: 135 ftAckerly10 miles

Under the center of the Mesa UWCD

District boundary from TWDB's file current as of November 2019. Later changes are not shown.

Home wells in and around the Mesa UWCD

Each dot is a home well from a state driller report, colored by depth. Tap one for its details and official report. Tap an empty spot to see what is under that point.

See underground

Well depth (ft)

  • <100
  • 100
  • 200
  • 300
  • 400
  • 600
  • 800+

Dark line: the district boundary (TWDB, 2019)

Key figures

Typical depth (middle half)
135 to 190 feet
Median depth
168 feet
Deepest 10% are past
208 feet
Water level (median)
78 feet
20 wells
Wells used
140
In the last 10 years
Counties
1
All years on file
269
median 167 ft, since 2001
Confidence
Standard (30 or more wells)

When the wells were finished, the water stood a median 78 feet below the surface (20 wells).

Map of the Mesa Underground Water Conservation DistrictDistrict boundary (Dawson County) with the places that have the most home wells.Lamesa: 173 ftLamesaLos Ybanez: 175 ftWelch: 118 ftWelchAckerly: 135 ftAckerly10 miles
District boundary from TWDB's file current as of November 2019. Later changes are not shown.

New home wells per year

Over the last three full years drillers reported about 14 new home wells a year; the peak was 21 in 2020.

Home wells reported per year in the Mesa UWCDFrom 2002 to 2026. The table below has every year.01020302002: 22003: 102004: 620042005: 72006: 52007: 42008: 720082009: 142010: 42011: 162012: 1920122013: 92014: 92015: 72016: 920162017: 62018: 132019: 102020: 2120202021: 172022: 182023: 152024: 1220242025: 142026: 13
Domestic wells with a depth, by the year they were finished. 2026 is still in progress.
Show the data table
YearWells
20022
200310
20046
20057
20065
20074
20087
200914
20104
201116
201219
20139
20149
20157
20169
20176
201813
201910
202021
202117
202218
202315
202412
202514
202613

Which formation the wells draw from

Most draw from the Ogallala Aquifer (77%), according to the state's High Plains Aquifer System model (TWDB).

Layer (state's model)ShareWellsTypical depth (ft)
Ogallala77%108132–185
Dockumat or just below the base of the Ogallala14%20170–206
Edwards-Trinity (High Plains)9%12154–205

For 96% of these wells the report says where the water enters (the screen or the open hole), and we use the middle of that interval.

Places with the most wells in the district

PlaceMedian depth (ft)Middle half (ft)WellsMain layer
Lamesa173160–19061Ogallala Aquifer
Los Ybanez175146–18230Ogallala Aquifer
Welch118110–13015Ogallala Aquifer
Ackerly135122–15512Dockum Group (at or just below the base of the Ogallala)

Counties

Depth over time

Home well depth in the district has not changed meaningfully in 20 years: the median was 162 feet in 2003 to 2007 and 160 feet in 2021 to 2025 (a difference under 10% or within the margin of error).

PeriodMedian depth (ft)Wells
2001–200516027
2006–201017134
2011–201515960
2016–202017559
2021–202516076
202616713

Embed this on your site

Districts, counties, reporters and agents can embed this summary, which updates itself every day. Copy and paste this code:

<iframe src="https://terrafunded.com/embed/wells/district/mesa-underground-water-conservation-district" title="Water wells: Mesa Underground Water Conservation District" loading="lazy" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;height:430px;border:0"></iframe>

Or this one line, which keeps the height right by itself:

<script async src="https://terrafunded.com/vendor/subsurface-embed-v1.js" data-district="mesa-underground-water-conservation-district"></script>

Free, under CC BY 4.0. We only ask that you keep the source link. Preview the widget

Common questions

How deep are wells in the Mesa UWCD?

Home water wells inside the Mesa Underground Water Conservation District (Dawson County, Texas) are typically 135 to 190 feet deep (median 168 ft, 140 wells drilled in the last 10 years).

Which formation do wells in the district draw from?

Most draw from the Ogallala Aquifer (77%), according to the state's High Plains Aquifer System model (TWDB).

What does a groundwater conservation district do?

In Texas, districts are the local authority over groundwater: they can require registration or permits for new wells, set spacing from other wells and property lines, and limit pumping. Each district writes its own rules, so ask the Mesa Underground Water Conservation District before drilling inside it.

What a well costs here

At the median depth for the district (168 feet), a complete home well would cost roughly $6,500 to $16,500: $25 to $60 per foot for drilling, casing and seal, plus $2,500 to $6,500 for the pump, pressure tank, controls and hookup at the well. Across the whole middle half of depths (135 to 190 feet) the range runs from $6,000 to $18,000. This is TerraFunded's estimate from published Texas prices, not a quote, and it leaves out trenching and the line to the house. Get prices from at least two licensed drillers.

How these numbers are made

We count new and replacement domestic (home) wells whose coordinates fall inside the district boundary. We use the last 10 years when there are at least 30 wells; otherwise all since 2001. The median is the middle well and the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile.

To tell which layer a well draws from, we take the ground elevation at its location, subtract the depth of the interval where water enters (or the bottom of the hole when the report does not give one) and see which layer of the state's model that point falls in.

For 96% of these wells the report says where the water enters (the screen or the open hole), and we use the middle of that interval.

How well it works: In 22,814 wells in the Texas part of the state's High Plains Aquifer System model (the Panhandle, the South Plains and the Permian Basin) where the State of Texas recorded the aquifer, the formation our method says the well draws from (as grouped on these pages) is the one the state recorded in about 75% of them; when it names the Dockum (4,542 wells), the state's record agrees only about 33% of the time, and most of the others are recorded as Ogallala wells.

  • The layers come from the Texas Water Development Board's High Plains Aquifer System model, with half mile cells, read here on a grid of about 1.2 by 1.4 miles. It is a regional model, not a survey of any lot.
  • The state's model has half mile cells; we read it on a grid of about 1.2 by 1.4 miles, Texas part only. Layers from version 1.01 (2015); the 2025 extension (1.02) did not change them. It is not a survey of any lot, so we give ranges.
  • Figures go by four groups: Ogallala; Pecos Valley; Edwards-Trinity and Rita Blanca (Cretaceous rock under the Ogallala; the Rita Blanca alone matched the state 19%); Dockum (upper and lower together: the state's codes almost never say which). The Edwards-Trinity group joins three aquifers in different places (High Plains around Lubbock, Plateau around Midland and Odessa, Rita Blanca in Dallam and Hartley): county and place pages name the local one where they can.
  • Dockum: when our method names the Dockum, the state's record agrees only 33% of the time over all years (61% for wells with a screened interval, which is 93% of home wells of the last 10 years); most of the rest are recorded as Ogallala wells. The median well we put in the Dockum ends about 18 ft under the base of the Ogallala as the model draws it. So these pages say "at or just below the base of the Ogallala, in the top of the Dockum", never a certain formation. The state's own 2025 report on this model says depth alone overstates the upper Dockum.
  • "Near or below the base" means the well ends near or below the base of the Dockum, or of the Ogallala where there is no Dockum (Permian red beds; Gray, Carson, Donley, Moore and north Potter counties). Half of these wells end within about 51 ft of the base, and the state usually records them as Ogallala or Dockum wells. That is not an error: the model simply ends there.
  • For old wells without a screened interval (bottom of the hole) the method is only a little better than always saying Ogallala (65% against 58%); with an interval it is 89% against 80%. Figures over all years carry that weakness; last 10 years figures rest almost entirely on intervals.
  • We never use the model's water levels. The water level on this page is the one each driller measured when the well was finished.

These are depths of real wells drilled nearby, not a promise about any property. Groundwater can change over short distances and with drought. A licensed water well driller can tell you what to expect on a specific tract.

Read the full methodology · Download the data (CSV, CC BY 4.0)

How to cite

TerraFunded (2026). Texas Well Atlas: Underground. From Texas Water Development Board driller reports and groundwater availability models (data as of November 10, 2026). https://terrafunded.com/wells/districts/mesa-underground-water-conservation-district. License CC BY 4.0. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24126380.

Sources