Skip to content

Water wells in the Brazoria County Groundwater Conservation District

Home water wells inside the Brazoria County Groundwater Conservation District (Brazoria County, Texas) are typically 225 to 463 feet deep (median 363 ft, 3,485 wells drilled in the last 10 years). All the wells the model covers draw from the Chicot Aquifer, according to the state's northern Gulf Coast Aquifer model (TWDB). Over the last three full years drillers reported about 314 new home wells a year; the peak was 555 in 2003. Estimated cost of a complete well at the median depth: $11,500 to $28,500.

Updated every day from Texas Water Development Board driller reports. Last update: November 11, 2026, using the state file of November 10, 2026.

Map of the Brazoria County Groundwater Conservation DistrictDistrict boundary (Brazoria County) with the places that have the most home wells.Alvin: 365 ftAlvinPearland: 335 ftPearlandManvel: 355 ftIowa Colony: 315 ftBailey's Prairie: 390 ftBailey's PrairieWild Peach Village: 480 ftWild Peach VillageAngleton: 268 ftLake Jackson: 320 ft20 miles

Under the center of the Brazoria County GCD

District boundary from TWDB's file current as of November 2019. Later changes are not shown.

Home wells in and around the Brazoria County GCD

Each dot is a home well from a state driller report, colored by depth. Tap one for its details and official report. Tap an empty spot to see what is under that point.

See underground

Well depth (ft)

  • <100
  • 100
  • 200
  • 300
  • 400
  • 600
  • 800+

Dark line: the district boundary (TWDB, 2019)

Key figures

Typical depth (middle half)
225 to 463 feet
Median depth
363 feet
Deepest 10% are past
550 feet
Water level (median)
60 feet
3,380 wells
Yield (median)
60 gpm
2,432 wells, gallons per minute
Wells used
3,485
In the last 10 years
Counties
1
All years on file
9,336
median 353 ft, since 1993
Confidence
Standard (30 or more wells)

When the wells were finished, the water stood a median 60 feet below the surface (3,380 wells), well above the bottom: the typical well holds about 303 feet of water.

Map of the Brazoria County Groundwater Conservation DistrictDistrict boundary (Brazoria County) with the places that have the most home wells.Alvin: 365 ftAlvinPearland: 335 ftPearlandManvel: 355 ftIowa Colony: 315 ftBailey's Prairie: 390 ftBailey's PrairieWild Peach Village: 480 ftWild Peach VillageAngleton: 268 ftLake Jackson: 320 ft20 miles
District boundary from TWDB's file current as of November 2019. Later changes are not shown.

New home wells per year

Over the last three full years drillers reported about 314 new home wells a year; the peak was 555 in 2003.

Home wells reported per year in the Brazoria County GCDFrom 2002 to 2026. The table below has every year.02004006002002: 1912003: 5552004: 52820042005: 5452006: 5402007: 4092008: 38720082009: 3362010: 2912011: 3182012: 30820122013: 3102014: 3492015: 3342016: 40520162017: 3262018: 3342019: 3712020: 43720202021: 3762022: 4142023: 3542024: 27920242025: 3082026: 217
Domestic wells with a depth, by the year they were finished. 2026 is still in progress.
Show the data table
YearWells
2002191
2003555
2004528
2005545
2006540
2007409
2008387
2009336
2010291
2011318
2012308
2013310
2014349
2015334
2016405
2017326
2018334
2019371
2020437
2021376
2022414
2023354
2024279
2025308
2026217

Which formation the wells draw from

All the wells the model covers draw from the Chicot Aquifer, according to the state's northern Gulf Coast Aquifer model (TWDB).

Layer (state's model)ShareWellsTypical depth (ft)
Chicot100%3,482225–463

For 90% of these wells the report says where the water enters (the screen or the open hole), and we use the middle of that interval.

Places with the most wells in the district

PlaceMedian depth (ft)Middle half (ft)WellsMain layer
Alvin365180–4601,745Chicot Aquifer
Pearland335163–390746Chicot Aquifer
Manvel355183–431661Chicot Aquifer
Iowa Colony315129–400494Chicot Aquifer
Bailey's Prairie390240–445319Chicot Aquifer
Wild Peach Village480346–517241Chicot Aquifer
Angleton268212–322184Chicot Aquifer
Lake Jackson320290–419170Chicot Aquifer
Hillcrest Village400356–542156Chicot Aquifer
Liverpool409166–566137Chicot Aquifer
Brazoria485425–505125Chicot Aquifer
Sweeny372190–500106Chicot Aquifer

Counties

Depth over time

Home well depth in the district has not changed meaningfully in 20 years: the median was 345 feet in 2003 to 2007 and 370 feet in 2021 to 2025 (a difference under 10% or within the margin of error).

PeriodMedian depth (ft)Wells
2001–20053421,930
2006–20103461,963
2011–20153491,619
2016–20203601,873
2021–20253701,731
2026380217

Embed this on your site

Districts, counties, reporters and agents can embed this summary, which updates itself every day. Copy and paste this code:

<iframe src="https://terrafunded.com/embed/wells/district/brazoria-county-groundwater-conservation-district" title="Water wells: Brazoria County Groundwater Conservation District" loading="lazy" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;height:430px;border:0"></iframe>

Or this one line, which keeps the height right by itself:

<script async src="https://terrafunded.com/vendor/subsurface-embed-v1.js" data-district="brazoria-county-groundwater-conservation-district"></script>

Free, under CC BY 4.0. We only ask that you keep the source link. Preview the widget

Common questions

How deep are wells in the Brazoria County GCD?

Home water wells inside the Brazoria County Groundwater Conservation District (Brazoria County, Texas) are typically 225 to 463 feet deep (median 363 ft, 3,485 wells drilled in the last 10 years).

Which formation do wells in the district draw from?

All the wells the model covers draw from the Chicot Aquifer, according to the state's northern Gulf Coast Aquifer model (TWDB).

What does a groundwater conservation district do?

In Texas, districts are the local authority over groundwater: they can require registration or permits for new wells, set spacing from other wells and property lines, and limit pumping. Each district writes its own rules, so ask the Brazoria County Groundwater Conservation District before drilling inside it.

What a well costs here

At the median depth for the district (363 feet), a complete home well would cost roughly $11,500 to $28,500: $25 to $60 per foot for drilling, casing and seal, plus $2,500 to $6,500 for the pump, pressure tank, controls and hookup at the well. Across the whole middle half of depths (225 to 463 feet) the range runs from $8,000 to $34,500. This is TerraFunded's estimate from published Texas prices, not a quote, and it leaves out trenching and the line to the house. Get prices from at least two licensed drillers.

How these numbers are made

We count new and replacement domestic (home) wells whose coordinates fall inside the district boundary. We use the last 10 years when there are at least 30 wells; otherwise all since 2001. The median is the middle well and the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile.

To tell which layer a well draws from, we take the ground elevation at its location, subtract the depth of the interval where water enters (or the bottom of the hole when the report does not give one) and see which layer of the state's model that point falls in.

For 90% of these wells the report says where the water enters (the screen or the open hole), and we use the middle of that interval.

How well it works: In 14,333 wells in the area of the state's northern Gulf Coast Aquifer model (Houston and Southeast Texas) where the State of Texas recorded the aquifer, the formation our method says the well draws from (as grouped on these pages) is the one the state recorded in about 83% of them, and that formation or the one next to it in at least 99%; of the 3,578 of those wells that the state records in the Evangeline, it names the Evangeline for about 51% and the Chicot for most of the rest.

  • The layers come from the Texas Water Development Board's northern Gulf Coast Aquifer model, with cells of about 0.62 mile (1 km). It is a regional model, not a survey of any lot.
  • The state's model has cells of about 3,277 ft (1 km, 0.62 mile); we read it on a grid of about 0.6 by 0.7 miles. It is not a survey of any lot, so we give ranges.
  • Figures go by three groups: Chicot, Evangeline, and Jasper and Catahoula with the Burkeville. The state's records cannot tell the Burkeville, the Jasper and the Catahoula apart at a well (alone, the Burkeville matched 33% and the Catahoula 50%), so they are never named one by one as the formation of a well or a place.
  • The line between the Chicot and the Evangeline is drawn differently by different studies. The state's records put about half of their Evangeline wells in what the model draws as the Chicot, mostly deeper wells in Harris, Montgomery, Waller, Liberty and Austin counties. Where both appear, the split is approximate.
  • "Near or below the base" means the well ends near or below the base of the Gulf Coast Aquifer (under the Catahoula: Jackson Group, Yegua and older). It is 1.3% of home wells; half of them end within about 85 ft of the base. That is not an error: the model simply ends there.
  • The model's top layer is a uniform 49 ft slab for the water table zone, not a rock unit; we merge it into the unit beneath. The model also covers Colorado, Lavaca, Fayette, Wharton and Matagorda counties (outside Groundwater Management Area 14), with the same framework. Texas part only.
  • We never use the model's water levels. The water level on this page is the one each driller measured when the well was finished.

These are depths of real wells drilled nearby, not a promise about any property. Groundwater can change over short distances and with drought. A licensed water well driller can tell you what to expect on a specific tract.

Read the full methodology · Download the data (CSV, CC BY 4.0)

How to cite

TerraFunded (2026). Texas Well Atlas: Underground. From Texas Water Development Board driller reports and groundwater availability models (data as of November 10, 2026). https://terrafunded.com/wells/districts/brazoria-county-groundwater-conservation-district. License CC BY 4.0. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24126380.

Sources